Charles Marohn
Activity overview
Latest activity by Charles Marohn
-
Can you just post a link to it?
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
Can you post a copy of the study?
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
I love this question. Here are my thoughts. https://www.loom.com/share/1730881a5c614c7eb09f3964be55d160?sid=147a0a5a-5e05-4c75-b48f-e59262968569
- View comment
- 1 vote
-
Removing doglegs is one of those traffic flow obsessions. Widen the street and speed up traffic, then doglegs become really dangerous. Thus removing them is orthodox. This project is really frustr...
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
You summarize this correctly, in my estimation. Here's an answer from GASB. Excerpt here, but I've got some thoughts afterwards. In general, governments are required to report capital assets at th...
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
I wrote a plan to do exactly that. Here's the link.
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
Yeah, you've reach the same problem I reached back in 2007. You can't scale costs this way, not in any reliable fashion. Even here in central Minnesota, with 200 feet of sandy glacial outwash to wo...
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
This reminds me of the time that the city here in Brainerd decided to put bike lanes in front of one of the Catholic churches (not the one I primarily attend). Why bike lanes there? Because they we...
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
Well, I don't think there is a solution here. A less dramatic upzoning would be.... um.... less pointless. But, yes, covenants can be removed, but more often they disappear because they are ignore...
- View comment
- 0 votes
-
You're demonstrating why I'm not a fan of restrictive covenants nor dramatic upzonings. This situation seems like bad policy decision meets bad policy decision. I don't see a simple or even logical...
- View comment
- 1 vote